Last Friday began the concert season of the Jalisco Philharmonic. The theme of the season is "Mozart, the genius" and because in this year celebrates 250 years of Mozart's birth. The first program was the presentation of the symphony 40 in G minor, Mozart's followed by playing the piano for 2 works on the same subject: the caprice n º 24 for violin by Niccolò Paganini. The first of these works by Witold Lutoslawski Polish and the second by Sergei Rachmaninov Vasíliyevich . To close, the orchestra performed Pines of Rome Ottorino Respighi of . In this latest work, I'd like Diana to give us his review.
Mozart.
The interpretation of Symphony 40 was dry. It is very difficult for any orchestra suddenly get a good interpretation of a work so familiar. The same happens when a pianist plays something as trite.
Lutoslawski.
Witold Lutoslawki
Vladimir Viard was the first of his two speeches with variations on a theme by Paganini, teacher Polish Witold Lutoslawski. I played some things Lutoslawski but I confess not knowing much of their work. I was surprised to see that he also explored the theme of Paganini caprice 24. The work is fresh and new. I loved the handling of textures within the work. I diríoa that this was the best part of the concert, no doubt. Viard's interpretation and mature.
Rachmaninov.
Even before I have talked to the Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini by Rachmaninov. Last year we were fortunate to listen to Adam Golka and this year with Viard. It guess the years of experience Viard at maturity of his approach to the rhapsody. What I found interesting is to hear the variations of Lutoslawski before Rachmaninov Rhapsody: Comparisons are inevitable and are very rich. I leave a recording of the concert is the last change and the finale of the piece of Rachmaninov. Despite the obvious mistakes of interpretation Viard was excellent.
0 comments:
Post a Comment